@@ -68,12 +68,14 @@ Prioritize the requirements as must-have, should-have, could-have, or won't-have
**AGGREGARED AND DETAILED VIEWS**
**7. Visualize SEB customer's accounts as a group (must-have)**
**7. Visualize SEB customer's accounts as a group (must-have)**
- Who: As a Financial Manager
- What: I want visualized SEB customers' accounts to be grouped together somehow
- Why: So I can quickly distinguish them from counterparties and focus on these accounts.
#207
[Idea of group node with links to account nodes show that these accounts belong to the same group](https://www.figma.com/board/49gjnZ5wU8wXuun5QMOKGN/CashFlowToolDiagrams?node-id=478-1820&t=I96TxqKwr3B9ScBg-1)
**8. Visualize SEB customers' accounts as currency nodes (must-have)**
...
...
@@ -83,6 +85,8 @@ Prioritize the requirements as must-have, should-have, could-have, or won't-have
- Why: So transactions edges are more spread out compared to all different currency edges entering and exiting a single account node and I can I can clearly distinguish between different incoming and outgoing currency amounts.
\-UC1, UC2
#209
[SEB customers' accounts nodes visualized as currency nodes](https://www.figma.com/board/49gjnZ5wU8wXuun5QMOKGN/CashFlowToolDiagrams?node-id=478-1820&t=I96TxqKwr3B9ScBg-1)
**9. Visualize counterparties by name as Nodes (must-have)**
...
...
@@ -91,6 +95,8 @@ Prioritize the requirements as must-have, should-have, could-have, or won't-have
- What: I want to visualize all counterparties of SEB customers as company nodes by company name.
- Why: So that I can have an overview of the counterparty companies that are involved in transactions and see much money is going to each vendor and how much money coming from each customer.
#210
[Counterparty nodes visualized as nodes with companies names](https://www.figma.com/board/49gjnZ5wU8wXuun5QMOKGN/CashFlowToolDiagrams?node-id=478-1820&t=I96TxqKwr3B9ScBg-1)
**10. Visualize All Private Persons as an Aggregate Node (must-have)**
...
...
@@ -99,6 +105,8 @@ Prioritize the requirements as must-have, should-have, could-have, or won't-have
- What: I want to visualize all private persons involved in transactions as a single aggregate node (labeled "Private.")
- Why: So that I can simplify the visualization, reduce complexity, and analyze cash flows to or from private individuals as a group, instead of viewing each person separately.
#211
[Private persons who are counterparties visualized as a single aggregate "Private" node](https://www.figma.com/board/49gjnZ5wU8wXuun5QMOKGN/CashFlowToolDiagrams?node-id=478-1820&t=I96TxqKwr3B9ScBg-1)
